February 9, 2011 11:19 AM updated: February 9, 2011 2:06 PM

Interesting point, but overall I have to break the news - your wife doesn't see in 3D EVER... 3D vision (i.e. "normal" for most people) requires two receptors, spaced far enough apart to receive different images depending on the distance from the viewer. Whether that's done "in reality" by looking at an object in front of you at a distance, or simulated through 3D glasses, the way your brain combines the two images to produce depth is exactly the same...

Now... perhaps her brain has learned over time to use the fuzzy image produced by one eye to augment her normal vision in the other and give her the ability to discern depth that way. There are also psychological effects - even if you close one eye and look around you, you THINK you're seeing in 3D just because you're so familiar with the surroundings that you know from experience how far away things are, but you're not REALLY seeing 3D.

Try a test - close your eyes, have a friend hold something out in front of you, then open one eye and try to reach up quickly and grab it. Likely you'll miss - at least by a little - unless you're really good at dealing with the experiential clues rather than depending on the actual depth perception.

By the way, you DO bring up a great point - which is the dominant eye effect. Pretty much everyone has one eye that is dominant. You can test this by holding up a finger at arm's length, and with both eyes open adjust it to cover up something - a picture on the wall or something a distance away. Then close each eye and note how the finger appears to move relative to the background. With ONE eye closed, the finger stays pretty much in the same place in relation to the background that it did with both eyes open. With the OTHER eye closed, the position changes. The eye that (when open) shows the finger in the same place is your dominant eye. This is important in certain things - like target shooting, for example.

I wonder how important this is for 3D effects, and if 3D programming is somehow designed for "left eyed" or "right eyed" people in some way?